<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener("load", function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=9772744&amp;blogName=dead+insect&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_FTP&amp;navbarType=SILVER&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.deadinsect.co.uk%2F&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fblogsearch.google.com%2F" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

why ad agencies are rubbish at HR and talent


apparently one of the worst jobs ever

This is something I've been thinking about a lot recently, as I've just left a really good job in a great agency to try going freelance.

Iain's written a nice post about how it's hard to get and retain motivated, creative, multi-skilled people, because, put simply, if they're that good, they'll go do their own thing.

I then read this awfully arrogant article, by a freelance computer programmer, on Reddit:


Working a real job is a win if you're lazy, greedy, or unmotivated. If you're average, you fit right in. And if you're above average, the basic terms of employment and premise of the arrangement is against your interests.


So in the face of this attitude (which I don't agree with), how can you retain smart, entrepreneurial people?


This is a prime example of how advertising agencies totally fail to walk their own talk.


You get the best people by making your work environment so unbelievably, jaw-droppingly cool, that it's legendary to work there.


You get the best financial and care packages for your staff - healthcare, profit shares, all that kind of normal stuff. You also need the best working processes that give your staff freedom to work effectively on interesting stuff.

Those are hygiene factors - all your competitors will start to offer the same anyway.


Then, the real work starts. You have to now make sure that your workplace is the arguably coolest place to work in the whole world. You have to add little flashes of cool to every single touchpoint with your employees - you know, the kind of the thing we tell our client brands to do to their consumers.

Ad agencies are still totally stuck in the 80s when it comes to all this stuff. Think of all the agencies you've been to with massive plush meeting rooms, but with their creatives sat 9-6 in call centre conditions just upstairs. All the while we're telling clients that consumers have all the power now, and it's about real values and authenticity.

The sad thing is that business knows this already - Google's market is the most creative and talent-driven business in the world today, and their office is a total geek's dream.


link to video of Google offices on YouTube

It really annoys me when top creative agencies do things like rewarding employees with iPods to keep them motivated - how unimaginative is that? Would you dare suggest such a mundane promotion for your clients?

Photo from Monky

"You're very creative. Have an iPod."

Some numbered points:

1. People will do irrational things if they're in love. You tell your clients this is true for consumers of their FMCG brands, so believe it's true for your employees and your agency. People will pay £3 quid for fruit in a bottle, and they'll stay in jobs where they could be paid a few more grand elsewhere.

2. It's hard work, and there's no one-size-fits-all solution - building a GooglePlex wouldn't be right for keeping talent at JWT. You need to understand your agency brand, understand your staff and have creative ideas which resonate deeply within both.

3. It's not going to be cheap, but it will work out in the long run, and being creative can achieve better results than unimaginative spending.

4. People follow other people - especially the active ones who create the agency culture. So you have to put extravagant effort into keeping these people. For example, when a very "on-culture" person has leaves an agency, the sense of loss is huge compared to the job-importance of that person. I remember feeling like this when Cookie left my old agency, and I didn't even know him that well then.

If you look at that list - it's all painfully obvious stuff that we present to clients again and again, but somehow we think it doesn't apply to the people we employ.

This would be a good time to name drop Work Club, where my friend Charlotte has just joined. They also believe that agency HR practices are in need of a shake up, and have a number of neat innovations, like planner-creative teams, and giving people a lot of freedom and flexibility in the way they work.

Anyone else seen any good workplace HR innovations?

Labels: , , , ,

posted by dead insect at 9:45 PM

7 Comments:

Blogger dead insect said...

From my personal experience:

I had been freelancing at glue for 1 week, when a handyman came round and started drilling loads of massive 3" holes in the astroturf floor. I realised he was putting a 9 hole mini-golf course in, and I fell in love with the place.

The golf wasn't really practical or fun, but I told everyone I knew about how cool my new work was, and they agreed. What can I say, I've always been shallow.

If you're looking to get more senior talent to love you, you need to different things that appeal to that audience. Like building a creche at work for their kids and dogs to play together in, or something. Not a good example, but you get what I mean.

Wednesday, 29 August, 2007  
Anonymous Adam said...

This is an important post.

For fellow readers I'd like to point out a blog post by Rory Sutherland on the various problems faced by younger agency employees with a few practical and impractical ways these might be fixed:

*How advertising people could have a much better life on far less money
http://tinyurl.com/2vyfbz

I haven't heard of any workplace innovations that have impressed me recently. St Lukes is an obvious reference point. I think having equity in the company you work at (not 'for', maybe 'with') is the strongest motivator. But if you want that, where do you go? Inwards, most likely.

Personally I think it is important for your values to be understood wherever you happen to be. I mean that in a quite deep way, which I won't go into here.

AdGrads are currently talking about personality fit:

http://adgrads.blogspot.com

I think - actually - I KNOW there's a lack of awareness and sophistication in the whole approach to recruitment. There's a belief that most ad/comms/brand people are much the same, have the same motivations and can thus be accommodated in the same narrow ways, albeit ways that will satisfy the majority, yet frustrate the few.

As Iain hinted, those few will seek out their own rewards on their own terms and perhaps we are all the better for it. We need better clients (sorry clients) so the more *real* entrepreneurs out there the better. (Sorry clients, but an MBA doesn't make you an entrepreneur.)

I believe the onus is really on employees to know themselves and find a way to match values and 'styles' with their agency or just their project team. I think this will be the vital survival skill for 'hotdesk/hotbum' working practices. Planner, know thyself:

*Planner Taxonomy
http://tinyurl.com/3dx8ug

Also posted on plannersphere but few took the bait. (Why?)
http://tinyurl.com/2p3lha

Some are dipping their toes in here:
http://tinyurl.com/29ye6e

I actually agree with your arrogant programmer. He probably read these nuggets of wisdom from Paul Graham too:

*Why hiring is obsolete
http://www.paulgraham.com/hiring.html

*How to create wealth
http://www.paulgraham.com/wealth.html

Apologies for the length of this comment! Just all very interesting to me at the moment.

Adam

Wednesday, 29 August, 2007  
Blogger dead insect said...

Wow thanks for your long and informative comment. It still makes me scared and a bit nauseous to see people talk about industry issues on this blog, but there you go. :)

I simply don't agree though that talented motivated people don't need permenant workplaces.

With a real job, you get to meet, be friends with, and chat have ideas with like-minded fun people, in a way you just don't get from bits of freelance work. Nor do you get this from distributed communities of "Ronin" like people are talking about.

It's impossible to separate this people aspect from the work aspect in an industry like ours. Maybe in coding or for fine artists, but not for people like us?

Thursday, 30 August, 2007  
Anonymous Adam said...

Yes, I must apologise for using your comments as a rant box on industry management stuff. Please don't hesitate to delete stuff if it becomes too awkward.

I certainly know what you mean by nauseous. I'll copy and paste my previous comment on my own blog to be sure I take any flack too! (Or would that draw yet more attention?)

I do agree with the people aspect. It is my simply my view that good teams need a mixture of skills and outlooks and that 'like-minded' could easy become 'same-minded'. And the industry assumption has always been 'people like us'.

I don't fit that (limited?) archetype well so this is a very personal thing.

I always think in 'roles' rather than 'jobs'. If you have a role (a general approach) which people understand you can slip into any team be immediately useful. Personas are great way of explaining this ideal:
http://tinyurl.com/2xb3ak

The Ronin thing is great. Though it depends an all members of the Ronin caste being aware of the need for different, yet complimentary, skills or ways of thinking than their own. This seems very difficult for 'some' people to grasp or admit to. I can understand why and you have to be very tactful in talking about this. Very!

From my point of view it's frustrating because I am easily excluded and a mutually supportive Ronin is exactly what I'm holding out for, if I'm being totally honest!

Adam

Thursday, 30 August, 2007  
Blogger dead insect said...

hey I was only joking about not liking planning-related discussions here!!

when I talk about like-minded, I'm not really referring to job-role stuff at all.

I mean the kind of people that "add value" to your personal life, not just to your work/job life.

When I've liked an agency a lot, it's because lots of people there inspired me - not in terms of work, or careers even, but in life stuff as well, such as friends, lifestyles, hobbies, families - just generally how to live life.

I would like to be a Ronin, (mainly because of Carlos Newton) but I feel you miss out a lot of good stuff (life learning) by doing so.

Friday, 31 August, 2007  
Blogger Will said...

Ant - Great post mate.

It really dovetails nicely with what we're writing about on Ad Grads; stopping those people who get disillusioned by rubbish agency procedures.

Personally, as good (or bad?) as I may be in my current Ronin/freelance role, it's nothing compared to what I could do in well picked team, much as I'd like to kid myself that the opposite is true.

And, if interacting with people is a cognitive arms race, helping us become more intelligent(as Pinker observes), I feel we definitely need to be a part of a team. It could be argued that you can get this from freelancing, but hell, it's just not the same - I don't feel you interact in quite the same way if you aren't seen as fully 'part of the team'.

Friday, 31 August, 2007  
Blogger Me and my big ......... said...

I really like this post but i think that maybe it is a money issue.
People going into advertising know that they can earn a lot of money so they figure they can earn more by going it alone rather than working in bad conditions for somebody else.
The thing i think you missed out as well was the fact that you also need to love the actual work you are doing.If you are just in a job for money then your going to take the 1st opportunity to make more money.
You need to have the ideas and love creating those ideas at work for you to stay at work.the guy who said the comment about a normal job being above him probably means that he'd rather tell people what to whilst he sits on his butt.because if a person starts their business, ultimately they want to have other people working for them.and them keeping your working conditions to a minimum helps to keep their bank balances to a maximum.
You obviously are a very creative person and you love your work so good luck to you and the freelancing and hopefully in the future you can set up your own agency which will be the coolest place to work in the world.

Thursday, 11 October, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home